They Are Lying to You About Israel. Here Is the Truth.

They think you are a fool. They think that if they repeat a lie often enough, from enough prestigious mastheads, you will accept it as truth. They are counting on your exhaustion, your compassion, and your desire for a simple story with a clear villain. And so they have crafted one for you, a monstrous fiction where defenders are aggressors, and the world’s most dangerous terror state is a victim.

Today, you are being told that Israel—the one democracy in a sea of tyranny, the one nation staring down the barrel of annihilation—is a war criminal. You are being told its fight for survival is a cynical political game. I am here to tell you that this is not just a lie; it is a moral inversion so profound it threatens the very foundation of the free world. It is time to draw a line. It is time to choose a side. And it is time you knew the truth.

Section 1: The Anatomy of a Deception

Let’s start with the lie that sits at the heart of this media firestorm: the strike on Tehran’s Evin Prison. We are given a precise number, 71 “civilians,” a figure offered up by the Iranian judiciary. Let us be brutally clear about the source: this is the same judiciary that presides over a system of show trials, that hangs dissidents from construction cranes, that tortures political prisoners in that very same prison. Their casualty reports are not journalism; they are propaganda, issued from the heart of a terror regime. They are as credible as a confession extracted under torture.

The narrative asks you to believe that in a country where the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) embeds its command centers, its weapons caches, and its most senior terror architects inside and underneath civilian structures, that a strike on a military-intelligence hub is a strike on “innocents.” This is the classic coward’s defense of the terrorist: hide behind a human shield and then cry “massacre” when your shield is pierced. It is a cynical, despicable strategy, and the global media has swallowed it whole, laundering the talking points of a death cult and presenting them as fact. The contempt this shows for the public's intelligence is staggering.

Then there is the even more insidious lie about motive. We are told this war is merely a “political gambit” for Prime Minister Netanyahu’s survival, a claim supposedly “proven” by the statements of a former American president. How we hoped the world would see through such a shallow, insulting distraction. To reduce a nation's fight against an imminent, existential threat to mere political scorekeeping is to be willfully blind. While commentators in their safe Western offices pontificate about polls, they conveniently ignore the intelligence that forced Israel's hand: the undeniable evidence that the Ayatollah’s regime had reached the nuclear “point of no return.” This wasn’t about politics. This was about a clock ticking down to zero.

Section 2: The Truth of a Reluctant Sword

For years, Israel pleaded with the world. For years, we presented the evidence. We showed the world how Iran, the planet's single greatest engine of terror, was funding Hezbollah and Hamas. We showed them how the IRGC was orchestrating attacks on shipping lanes, on civilian centers, and on our allies. We pointed to the regime's own words, their constant, explicit, chanted promise to wipe Israel off the map. The world offered us diplomacy—negotiations that the Iranian regime used as a smokescreen to enrich uranium, to perfect their missile technology, and to march ever closer to a bomb.

We did not want this fight. We are a nation of builders, not destroyers. We are a people who turn desert into farmland, who pioneer life-saving technologies, who cherish every single human life because we know so intimately the cost of losing it. But our patience, and the world's, finally ran out when we were faced with an enemy that had cornered us. All other options had been exhausted. The choice was simple and terrible: act now, or wait for a mushroom cloud over Tel Aviv.

“Operation Am Kelavi” was not an act of aggression. It was the last resort of a nation with its back to the wall. It was a courageous act of pre-emptive self-defense, a moral and legal imperative. To sit and wait for the first nuclear strike—to absorb the annihilation of millions before acting—is not a virtue. It is suicide. And Israel will not commit suicide to appease the sensibilities of a world that refuses to see the threat standing right in front of it.

Section 3: A Stark Moral Contrast

This is a conflict of absolute moral clarity. On one side, you have Israel. A nation that uses the most sophisticated technology on Earth to conduct surgical strikes, to distinguish between combatant and civilian, to minimize collateral damage even when the enemy does everything in its power to maximize it. Our goal is the preservation of life and the defense of freedom.

On the other side, you have the Iranian regime. A theocracy that glorifies death. A regime that fires indiscriminate rockets at our cities, that funds proxies to slaughter families in their homes, that brutalizes its own people for demanding basic human rights. A regime whose contribution to the world is instability, extremism, and terror. Whose response to being caught red-handed building a nuclear weapon is to fabricate disgusting blood libels about Israel poisoning food aid—a lie so vile it reveals the depraved soul of its source.

To see the suffering in Gaza is to see the handiwork of Iran. They ignite the fires on our borders, they supply the weapons, they foment the hatred, and then they and their sympathizers point to the tragic, inevitable consequences as proof of Israeli evil. It is the strategy of an arsonist blaming the firefighter. The “Death to the IDF” chants at Glastonbury, the political victories of Israel's detractors in New York—these are the dividends of Iran's investment in chaos, celebrated by the naive and the malevolent in the West who do not understand that the fire, once lit, will not stop at Israel’s border.

Section 4: The Strategic Imperative: A Safer World

Let us speak with cold, hard logic. What would the world look like today if Israel had not acted? It would be a world held hostage by a nuclear-armed Ayatollah. Imagine a regime that hangs homosexuals and stones women to death, but now with the power of nuclear blackmail. Imagine a Middle East thrown into a terrifying nuclear arms race. Imagine IRGC terror cells in Europe and America operating under a nuclear umbrella. That is the world of chaos that Israeli courage just prevented.

This action was not an escalation. It was a profound act of de-escalation. By surgically removing the head of the serpent—the key commanders and the nuclear infrastructure—Israel crippled the regime’s ability to wage its planned, massive war. We restored a deterrence that had been dangerously eroded. We did the world a favor. We took on the burden that other, more powerful nations were too cowardly to assume. We have made the world safer, and in return, that world, misled by lies, condemns us.

It is a sad, pathetic irony. But it does not change the facts. Israel acted to protect its families, but in doing so, it protected London, Paris, and New York. This was a blow for freedom, a necessary strike against fanaticism, and a gift to the oppressed people of Iran who dream of one day being free from the tyrants who use them as shields.

---

The choice before you is clear. You can believe the propaganda of a terror state, amplified by a gullible or complicit media. Or you can stand with the nation that is holding the line for civilization itself.

What can you do?

• Share this truth. Do not let the lies stand unchallenged in your social circles or online. Post this article. Talk about it.
• Demand clarity from your leaders. Ask them why they condemn the defender instead of the tyrannical regime that made this action necessary.
• Do not be silent. Your voice is a weapon in the fight against deception. Use it. Stand with the brave. Stand with Israel.